Wrestling with my Words
Words, for me, have always been a sort of
– hobby. I’m not the most accomplished
articulate, but I’d like to think I can throw around a few fancy fragments and
phrases – enough to lift my level of loft up a notch or two should I desire a
defined discourse or declaration. And
yet, for all of my enthusiastic English efforts – there are a few words that I
find difficult to annunciate and, interestingly enough – accomplish. Two such words with which I wrestle are - specific,
and success(ful).
According to the brother’s Merriam and the most notable Mr. Webster, the word “specific” (pronounced \ spi-ˈsi-fik \ ) relates to the “properties of somethings that allow it to be referred to a particular category; restricted to a particular individual, situation, relation, or effect; exerting a distinctive influence; free from ambiguity; etc.” I know this. I review it, write it, and read it within my mind as such… and yet, when it should seek to escape across my lips, it becomes something entirely different. It becomes a sputtered form of Pacific… you know, that big beautiful body of water where something “specific” is subject to share its space in a sea of insignificance, where any attempt at definitive definition is drowned within a diverse ecological expanse.
For myself, I am a relativist. I believe there are precious few things that
fall within the structured set of “specifics.”
Everything is in relative to its existence, and relatable to the
world. Subjective rather than specific,
where the world rotates in wonder – where the only fixed concept is that change is
the only constant. Subjective rather
than specific, where even myself – my views, my beliefs - are altered as
additional information or alternative ideas become available. How can I limit my scope to “specific” when so much is still
unseen? Subjective, rather than
specific – I can say \ səb-ˈjek-tiv \ in my sleep.
Success is a word that is perhaps a
little less... specific…in its interpretation.
Standard meanings of success (pronounced \ sək-ˈses \ ) as defined my by
friends - Merriam(s) and Webster, infer it to be “a favorable outcome…the
attainment of wealth, favor, or eminence…one that succeeds.” Other “.com” dictionary offerings also
include definitions with such inflated ideals as “the attainment of wealth,
position, honors, or the like…a performance or achievement that is marked by
success…as measured by the attainment of goals, wealth, etc…” – all instances
that provide me with no promptings of influence or aspiration. The generic nature of the definition of “success” leaves too much room for
interpretation. From my lips, the word “success” often gets stuck, sounding as
stutter – a stammer as I struggle to define my own measure of it.
In the perfectly paradoxical fashion of a
true Carol Jean, it is my belief that the reason I have difficultly
annunciating the word “success” is
due entirely to the fact that it is far too “pacific” of a word, that is to say
- far too vast, too “non-specific.” Even a relativist such as myself needs some
sort of…stick to measure my ability against.
My imagination runs far too rampant to be left open to such a level of
interpretation! What measurement do I
hold myself to – wealth? What level is worthy of success? I could live like a pauper and still feel
like queen! Accomplishment? To what degree, what litmus? Is it the accomplishment you deem worthy or
notice, or that which I feel is significant to my own existence or
excel-ence? Goals? Mine, or those the world would have me
meet? These questions, these
inconsistencies are the reason that word “success”
is far too subjective to be an effective evaluation of self or society.
Given the above considerations, I am left
to wonder if the reason I cannot say these “specific”
words is indeed due to my inability to assimilate their definition into my
life? Do you think this is
possible? Could it be an individual flaw
brought into being by my own experience, or is it a mere fluke complicated by my
own overthinking? One could say they are
common “s” sound struggles experienced by many speakers, but I do not notice
this deficiency as being present in my speech with other strong-sounding “s”
words, and it is not something that has been a noted part of my speech for my
entire speaking life… only as I have aged through my experience has it surfaced
as a consistent challenge. I’m almost to
the point of accepting it as yet another individual oddity, but there are times
– times when I wish to present a polished presence, when this error entirely
infuriates me.
What about you?
Have you any words with which you wrestle? I’d love you to share your struggle as I
have.
Comments
Post a Comment